In 2009, the residents of a quiet neighborhood in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, began their day like any other, only to find an unusual email waiting in their inboxes. The message was startling and direct: “Stop using your car now.” It went on to explain that their driving habits had been monitored, and they were being asked to cease driving immediately. The initial reaction was one of alarm. Was this some kind of threat or blackmail?
But the truth was far from sinister. The email was a collaborative effort from the City of Rotterdam and the company managing the local highways. Their shared mission was to tackle the persistent traffic jams that choked the city daily, contributing to pollution and frustration among its inhabitants.
The Common Solution: Bigger Roads?
Many residents wondered why the city didn’t simply build bigger highways or add new ones. It seemed like an obvious solution—more roads should mean less congestion, right?
Enter the Braess Paradox
This is where the “Braess Paradox” comes into play. This counterintuitive theory suggests that increasing road capacity to alleviate traffic jams can actually worsen them. How could this be?
The paradox explains that adding new roads often leads to more people choosing to drive. Those who had previously given up driving due to congestion would return to their cars, and those who avoided rush hour would start using their cars again, believing the additional road would ease their commute. The result? Even worse traffic jams than before.
A Smarter Approach
The authorities in Rotterdam understood this paradox well. Instead of expanding the road network, they aimed to encourage behavioral changes among residents. By asking people to reduce their car usage, they hoped to decrease overall traffic volume and improve the city’s air quality. It was a bold and innovative approach, rooted in a deep understanding of urban traffic dynamics.
The Residents’ Response
Initially, the residents were skeptical and even resistant. But as the reasoning behind the request became clear, many began to see the wisdom in it. Gradually, they adapted, finding alternative ways to commute and reducing their reliance on cars. Public transportation, cycling, and walking became more popular choices, and slowly but surely, the traffic jams began to ease.
The strange email that once caused confusion and concern ultimately led to a positive change in Rotterdam. The city became less congested, cleaner, and more livable, demonstrating the power of innovative thinking and collective action.
In the end, the story of the unusual email and the Braess Paradox became a remarkable chapter in Rotterdam’s history, a testament to the city’s commitment to sustainable living and intelligent urban planning.
What do you think about this approach to solving traffic in cities?
Thank you for reading! Please sign up for my blog crisbiecoach so you don’t miss out on any posts and also for Wise&Shine an incredible online magazine!
Crisbie Coach 